My question to pro-choice supporters

[Whateverist]

I believe the whole "child support" thing came about because of the primitive 50's thinking that women should stay home, raise the kids, and not work.

With modern feminism, the goddamn woman can take care of herself and the child without any assistance from the man.

I think you make that sound more trivially easy than it really is.  Still, some women are capable of doing that if it is something they want.

---

The only problem here is that you've removed all accountability for the man. Now he can go and impregnate a bunch of women and leave them holding the bag. I think we should be putting our efforts into creating male birth control rather than giving them a convenient out when they screw up and knock some chick up. There are men (I've uh... "met" many of them personally), who would love to germinate the female population with as much seed as they could if they could just opt out of the whole payment and responsibility thing.

Bolded:  The woman is having sex with the man, she is as much a part of it as him.  If she notices there is no condom being used, then she is just at fault for becoming pregnant.

In the end, it will be a she said, he said predicament, and courts have been notoriously famous for taking the side of the woman over that of the man when it comes to these situations, because how could a woman possibly support herself and a child in the modern times of feminism?

You seem to harbor a lot of resentment toward feminism.  Are you homosexual only because you are disappointed by women choosing to get down off that pedestal?

Also, they both notice that no condom is being used so how does that shift all the responsibility onto the woman for the ensuing pregnancy?  I would never depend on a new partner to ensure there would be no unwanted pregnancy.  I've never wanted to make a baby and I've taken responsibility to ensure that won't happen.  Guys who don't do bear some responsibility.