My question to pro-choice supporters

[Mr.Obvious]

This would require more taxes of course. Like disability payments or unemployment cheques. As a society we'd have to accept that one day we might find ourselves in this situation. The small fees of the many financing those relative few who actually find themselves in the position.

Why would it require more taxes rather than better use of existing taxes that already dwarf the entirety of what;s used at present for the same purpose?  I agree that it;s not workable unless we improve the system...but I can't imagine why our refusal or failure to improve the system justifies a unidirectional lack of parity for the consequences of a unilateral decision.   In that case..it's not the father who failed..but society.  

I'm not sure I agree a potential parent, male or female, made their choice at conception, though. Especially not if they take necessary precautions but they fail somehow, from ripped condom to forgetting to take the pill.

-Or just doesn't want a kid.  A female doesn't have to establish that she tried super hard not to have a kid...not to have a kid.  No one should have to, it's not a legitimate qualifier.

Different countries. Different societies. Different wellfare states. Different taxes and applications.
Suffice to say, I'm not saying don't change THE system. I'm saying if you were to make things different, you'd better make sure THE system adapts.
My country's wellfare hasn't adapted to evolutionisten in our population. Which doesn't bode well for THE future. Best to avoid that noise.