RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 12, 2017 at 5:51 pm
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2017 at 5:53 pm by Amarok.)
1.Having a nature does not define the nature as good . Let alone defining it as the greatest good
2. Always having said nature does not resolve the original issue
3. Being restrained by said nature does not resolve the issue
4. Good as jorm pointed good is not a nature it's actions.
5. All the characteristics you attach to your god are arbitrary as duck .And can be subdivide into arbitrary categories.
Lastly I don't care what god your going with it does not change the outcome as was already pointed out .So my point is still relevant
2. Always having said nature does not resolve the original issue
3. Being restrained by said nature does not resolve the issue
4. Good as jorm pointed good is not a nature it's actions.
5. All the characteristics you attach to your god are arbitrary as duck .And can be subdivide into arbitrary categories.
(July 12, 2017 at 5:51 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: 1.Having a nature does not define the nature as good . Let alone defining it as the greatest good
2. Always having said nature does not resolve the original issue
3. Being restrained by said nature does not resolve the issue
4. Good as jorm pointed good is not a nature it's actions.
5. All the characteristics you attach to your god are arbitrary as duck .And can be subdivide into arbitrary categories.
Lastly I don't care what god your going with it does not change the outcome as was already pointed out .So my point is still relevant
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb
