Some people like harm, it can be consensual. Personally I don't get it but, well...
Again one can make a subjective moral decision and then assess a morally objective action.
If I like having my balls nailed to a plank of wood, that may cause harm, even irreparable, but is it wrong?
I don't think it would be a good thing for me, but another person can validly disagree.
It causes no harm to others. It is against wellbeing, but affords the person pleasure at no apparent cost to another.
Morality is difficult, subjective but not without moral actions being objectively defined.
If there was an absolute moral objectivity, one could not explain sociopaths or psychopaths. Evolutionary speaking these extremes are rather trivial.
NO GODS REQUIRED
Again one can make a subjective moral decision and then assess a morally objective action.
If I like having my balls nailed to a plank of wood, that may cause harm, even irreparable, but is it wrong?
I don't think it would be a good thing for me, but another person can validly disagree.
It causes no harm to others. It is against wellbeing, but affords the person pleasure at no apparent cost to another.
Morality is difficult, subjective but not without moral actions being objectively defined.
If there was an absolute moral objectivity, one could not explain sociopaths or psychopaths. Evolutionary speaking these extremes are rather trivial.
NO GODS REQUIRED
