(July 17, 2017 at 12:22 am)Khemikal Wrote: It's also a useful way of making a claim in such a manner that could not be construed, later, as fraud. Back when asked about the specifics of funding and attendance/profit projections and how all of it was arrived at he would wave his hands in the air and say "my lawyers know more than me about that". The guy isn't a true believer, he's a common con. Give him a few more years, he'll come up with another religious themed for profit venture that just so happens to coincide with a juicy peice of public funding. It's his organizations MO.
But he owns the creation museum and AIG, and is planning on other projects, so it's not like he needs it. He just leaves a broken community in his wake and pays no price. If there was such a thing, I'd sell my soul to ensure he and everyone like him paid for it dearly.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.