RE: Objective morality as a proper basic belief
July 17, 2017 at 4:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2017 at 4:30 pm by JackRussell.)
(July 17, 2017 at 4:10 pm)SteveII Wrote:(July 17, 2017 at 3:37 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Your post are showing signs of degression. Attacking the person, changing the subject, and trying to attack arguments I'm not making. This is not part of intelligent discussion.
There is a big difference, in claiming, that there is "some connection" between harm and morals, and claiming that they are the basis for it.Which is it, that you are claiming to be the axiom? I also notice a connection between humans and morality. And while we at it, can you confirm exactly what statement or premise, that you are claiming to be axiomatic? While your rhetoric and sophism game may be good (i assume that is the "game" you where referring to earlier), many words, is not a substitute for substance and logical thinking.
And if you don't want to have an intelligent conversation, and just want to shout down everything I say, without addressing it. Fine, I look towards some smarter atheist to reason with.
The bluster covers the thin reasoning. He does not want to get anywhere near the fact that there exist a basic objective morality built into every human being that is not so cut and dried as his 'harm axiom'.
Explain sociopaths and psychopaths then? Evolution has a pretty good stab at this.
I am Bi-Polar, give me the God's honest truth on the hell I've lived through.
And I still submit that you and I are more moral than the god of your book and the god you think you talk to.
If we met, we would probably have a nice time and agree on many things. Why would you think I think that?
