(July 23, 2017 at 8:50 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(July 19, 2017 at 7:48 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: [emphasis added -- Thump]
Mischaracterization. You try to paint it as neutral, when your "good" book makes it clear that the only consideration is if the captor is happy with his captive.
"If it didn't work out" would seem to translate as "If Stockholm Syndrome didn't set in". *snort*
Notice there's still no reply. Gosh. I wonder why?
Yeah, I mean, it's not like having an answer that's complete bullshit or a total non sequitur is off the table for them.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
