RE: Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?
July 26, 2017 at 6:51 pm
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2017 at 6:56 pm by Whateverist.)
OP's ?: Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?
A: Only if you want others to take it seriously. For your own amusement, have it your way.
To exclaim "Oh, yeah right - not likely" isn't quite the same thing as claiming it is false. In general, your shit is bullshit if you're talking about shit no one can see, touch or measure and you take no responsibility for establishing its bonafides.
A: Only if you want others to take it seriously. For your own amusement, have it your way.
(July 26, 2017 at 6:04 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 26, 2017 at 5:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote: I wouldn't go using the words "blind spot" considering the age of the book of mythology you defend.
Actually, claiming that something is false because it is old, or better because it is new; is a fallacy.
To exclaim "Oh, yeah right - not likely" isn't quite the same thing as claiming it is false. In general, your shit is bullshit if you're talking about shit no one can see, touch or measure and you take no responsibility for establishing its bonafides.