This is getting tedious. Extraordinary claims I already believe require very little support. Those I don't believe do.
The difference is the reception you expect for the extraordinary claims you believe. That my wife loves me and I her are not things you need to believe. That there are depths to each one of us to which we can appeal for greater insight than we hold consciously is another claim I hold, can't support but don't expect you to accept. Do you see the difference? Why do you feel entitled to my acceptance of what you cannot adequately support? Can't you maintain belief without universal agreement?
The difference is the reception you expect for the extraordinary claims you believe. That my wife loves me and I her are not things you need to believe. That there are depths to each one of us to which we can appeal for greater insight than we hold consciously is another claim I hold, can't support but don't expect you to accept. Do you see the difference? Why do you feel entitled to my acceptance of what you cannot adequately support? Can't you maintain belief without universal agreement?