(July 27, 2017 at 7:54 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I noticed a series of posts, along this line from you here. I feel fairly confident (they can correct me, if I'm wrong) in saying that the theist involved in this conversation are not saying that everything anyone has claimed is always true. Also in my experience, it is followed by a similar line of questions, for which you believe things, which you have to trust the testimony of others for their validity. Also in my experience, this takes a very long time for an atheist to admit this when asking questions.
So, unless you are holding to a position apart from what I described above, and justifying the most rigid fundamentalist and conspiracy theorist out there. (I can think of a lot of things to question, and say there is no evidence for; on these grounds alone) I thought that perhaps it may speed things up, to skip this part, and move on to discussing what makes a testimony good evidence.
I've read this three times and I still don't have the remotest idea what you're saying.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.