(July 28, 2017 at 1:18 am)Godscreated Wrote:(July 27, 2017 at 9:36 am)Inkfeather132 Wrote: I already showed you how that "argument" isn't logical. Paul judges all women based on Eve's behavior, which is not how the world works. I don't judge all men based on Noah, or all black people based on Martin Luther King, Jr. It's stupid because there is diversity in large groups. Not all women would have eaten the fruit, not all men would have just done what their wife told them without questioning. Paul's argument was incorrect and you are the one ignoring that.
I've ignored nothing, Paul was relating to women through God's judgement and that's why he made the statement he did. Your view is a secular view on this subject and it has no place in the teaching of spiritual matters. Diversity has nothing to do with understanding God's word because ultimately one can't understand the truths without the guidance of the Holy Spirit. There were not a bunch of women nor men at that particular time so your thinking is irrelevant, and yes everyone would have fallen to that temptation. Why, because those two knew God through experiencing His presence, same goes for Moses and they failed.
GC
So basically, it's not Paul judging all women based on the actions of one, it's god doing that? How is that any better? It's still a faulty argument, show me how it's not.
Being careful is for people who can't handle surprises.
