Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?

[LastPoet]

But your entire premise of all the NT players being fooled has absolutely no evidence except people were fooled before and since. In the absence of any real evidence of deceit it seems that is just an assumption entirely based on the supernatural content of the accounts. If that is so, you are question begging: the events are not evidence of the supernatural because the supernatural does not exist.

In the absence of REAL evidence, deceit is the more likely explanation.  Fixed that for ya.

When you disguise it as an unpassable moving goal post, just bury it under many words devoid of meaning, just to keep that goalpost alive. Then act like you have won the debate when just about everyone is confused.

Playing chess with a pigeon. He strout, shit all over the board and fly away victorious.