(July 31, 2017 at 6:16 pm)SteveII Wrote:"Extraordinarily robust evidence" is the verbose term. A bald assertion can be claimed to be "evidence", but it's bad evidence.(July 31, 2017 at 2:29 pm)JackRussell Wrote: I agree, I find it frustrating that Steve thinks he has this though.
If his bullshit was so obvious we would all believe. So he either thinks we are in wilful denial or that we are fibbers. Or, and he won't accept this, he may be wrong.
You repeatedly miss my point. I don't care if you don't find the evidence compelling. I argue against those who are confused about what a claim of "no evidence" means and I discuss things with those who want to discuss the evidence there is. As it pertains to this thread, there is no such thing as extraordinary evidence. Only evidence.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 12, 2024, 2:14 am
Thread Rating:
Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)