Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?

[Astonished]

So...you're using your book to answer questions about your book, lol.  Got it.

The question I was answering is how do we know about God. I don't really see how your non-discussion, peanut-gallery-level comment applies.

The question you were failing to answer, is actually answered by "We don't. It's almost certainly made up."

Look, dipshit, I'm getting sick to death of your repetitious, thoughtless responses. Natural theology is a load of absolute donkey shit. Naturalism is just about what's here, not what's 'beyond' and nothing, NOT A GODDAMN BUTTFUCKING THING in nature suggests there even is anything beyond. Your mental defects are the only thing making you think there are, or MUST BE. Seek help.

Your revealed theology not only does not build upon the last point, it tears it down even further. Naturalism proves beyond any doubt that the scriptures are complete fabrications and the products of the sun-baked, tiny, primitive minds of stone-age goatfuckers. Try reading something else and find as many fuck-ups as the bible. I dare you.

Appearing in the person of...someone we don't even know existed and absolutely certainly did not exist as described. What the fuck makes you think any of this supports the rest? Did your mom pull a Forrest Gump thing to get you into class with normal kids when you shouldn't have been?

Personal witn...fucking hell, how old are you? Every last one of these fucking points can be chalked up to a fucking schizophrenic delusion, and lest we forget, those promises made in the NT have largely failed to come true, beyond what could be done by human hands and not a damn thing about the divine.

What the hell, literally, what in the fucking hell is wrong with you? How is your mind capable of being this backward?