(August 9, 2017 at 11:05 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(August 9, 2017 at 10:52 am)Astonished Wrote: What exactly is a poe? Is it distinct from a troll or just a synonym? I've heard them mention it on the Atheist Experience show but had no idea what they were talking about, and forgot about it til now.
A Poe is someone who fakes certain beliefs or viewpoints in order to make people who genuinely hold those viewpoints look bad. It comes from Poe's Law, which states that any parody of fundamentalism is impossible to distinguish from genuine fundamentalism, because there are actual people who hold those views. That's why it's always a question of whether or not someone is a Poe. For example, someone comes onto the forum, parroting the most oversimplified, ridiculous versions of theistic arguments. Option 1) they honestly believe those arguments, option 2) they are faking it to make theists look bad. Option 2 would be a Poe. The problem is that it's hard to tell the difference, since we've all met theists who actually believe those wacky things (I'm sure you can think of a handful on this forum alone).
A troll is just someone who wants to stir shit up without adding anything to a discussion, just being a douchebag. They aren't mutually exclusive either.
As soon as I finished reading that first sentence, I was like, "Oh, is that like when they say that it's impossible to tell if someone who says something stupid in the name of religion is actually legitimately that batshit or if they're just faking?" But then you immediately followed it up with that. Why is it called Poe's law? Did Edgar Allan Poe have a satirical anti-religious bent or is it named after someone else called Poe or was there just no other better one-syllable name to give it?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.