Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 8, 2025, 5:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
White supremacists and counter protesters clash in Charlottesville
RE: White supremacists and counter protesters clash in Charlottesville
(August 14, 2017 at 10:01 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: Stop mis-representing my position it's annoying and dishonest. I never said anything about segregating water fountains, I clearly pointed out that if the statue doesn't violate any laws or rights then they should be able to display it. The statue is legal, I'm not sure why the choice to display it is being compared to human rights violations. The town has a right to display it or take it down and that is the right I'm defending.

Yep and slavery was also at one time deemed constitutional. 

But ok, if you want to claim it is legal, fine, still a huge difference between legal and moral. Just because you can staple your nuts to the wall doesn't mean you should.

It still remains that any of the war figures in monument who defended the south were defending cruelty to other humans and ownership of other humans. What they represented did for far too long treat other humans WITH force of law as sub human. There is no polite way to put it. At one time most of our population including the courts saw it as perfectly legal to deny women the right to vote.

There is a reason we have separation of powers, and even with voters, we have also had a history of "the right to petition the government for a redress of grievance". That means just because even if a majority wants something, does not mean they always get it. It is why even despite the GOP fight to keep gay marriage illegal it became legal. 

The argument over local vs federal is not a good argument. If it were, slavery would still exist and segregation would still exist. Those statues regardless still represent a horrible past regardless of "why shouldn't they be allowed."

All I am seeing in your argument is mob rule by virtue of popularity. That is now how our republic works and no, the majority should not get everything it wants all the time. it is why we have a Constitution. 

I doubt you would make the same argument if it were a Nazi flag a majority of a town wanted on public property.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: White supremacists and counter protesters clash in Charlottesville - by Brian37 - August 14, 2017 at 10:16 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Indian-American Nikki Haley: Plan to Counter the China Threat. Nishant Xavier 46 4092 August 6, 2023 at 4:06 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  That pro white thread. TheClearCleanStuff 161 28202 May 5, 2022 at 9:18 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Black/White people news thread for all news current, historical, or otherwise. Huggy Bear 77 6264 February 14, 2022 at 2:47 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  More from the self intitled white anti maskers. Brian37 57 4858 April 21, 2021 at 2:27 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  More entitled white woman problems. brewer 62 4750 December 30, 2020 at 10:23 pm
Last Post: Aristocatt
  Your Villain Is Served - Middle Aged White Man Duty 15 1776 December 27, 2020 at 11:06 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Armed Black Protesters March Through Confederate Park The Architect Of Fate 26 2384 July 16, 2020 at 11:46 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  The Lady Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks - Hysterical White Middle Class BLM Activism Duty 31 2939 July 1, 2020 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  White supremacists protecting Churchill statue get 'that work' in UK Huggy Bear 50 4983 June 16, 2020 at 12:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  what white supremacists? Drich 150 16272 June 10, 2020 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)