RE: White supremacists and counter protesters clash in Charlottesville
August 16, 2017 at 6:21 pm
(August 16, 2017 at 5:40 pm)Sterben Wrote:(August 16, 2017 at 4:53 pm)Drich Wrote: hey, retard vol.2
How many people were shot at this rally???? Think for yourself moron, if no one was shot how many times was a gun discharged??? google it... 0 times both accounts. now how many head injuries? 30+ why? bad people on both sides bought club shield mace to hurt people who do not think the way they do.
That is bigotry, not what you think about a statue or what you think about white or black people. bigotry is bring a club to smash someone's head in because they do not think the same way about something you do.. Does not matter what that something is, it's your wicked heart that justifies you bring a bat to a protest.
Again doesn't matter which side of the protest you are on. You are evil for bring the bat, shield, helmet, mace, and tazer to a protest you feel strongly about.
Remember the whole free speech thing? it's not just to protect popular speech. It's primary purpose is to protect anti government unpopular speech. Why?? because our forefather's knew what an unhappy minority would do if left unchecked long enough
moron Wrote:As soon as you bring a weapon to a rally your intentions are clear that all you want is war. If you don't have the courage to fight without one, your just as bad a Trump supporter. If you are to stupid to fight a social issue without a firearm, you need to stay home and let the adults in the room handle it. Armed conflict has always been last resort option, now if they do want to repair themselves and their group reputations(if your able to find any silver lining in supporting a racist movement) It would start with a public apologizes and some lines about condemning the actions that some of your groups undertook upon others who opposed them.
That is what you said...
Then you say:
Quote:No one said anything about firearms being discharged, we were talking about how weapons were present at the rally.but you did, or do you not understand the word war???
War=killing people on mass scale.
So your broken logic says I bring a gun I want to kill people, then you follow up by saying "if you need a fire arm to fight a social issue... Armed conflict is always..." again maybe you do not understand the words you use and or what they mean. Need a fire arm to fight=discharging a firearm. there is only one way to use a firearm (lest it becomes a club which again was brought by the alt lefters as well) and that is to discharge the fire arm
Armed conflict refers to the discharge of firearms.
So then I pointed out not one round was discharged let alone anyone shot. why? because you seem to be too stupid to discern the lawful open carry of a fire arm in that state and someone shooting someone with a gun. I simply pointed out there is a huge difference between legal open carry and killing someone or even discharging said gun...
How many alt left protests can boast no firearms discharged no property damage? It was because everyone had a gun/those who did were law abiding gun owners, and as such kept the situation from getting completely out of control.
