Why Christians persist in not spelling "sense" correctly I don't know. Maybe it's because they're so bad at having any.
>This man has no idea what he's talking about
Which man? Also, if you mean the Pope, I would say he has a pretty damn good idea what he's talking about, being the boss.
>Why should I or any christian get upset at the ravings of a deluded atheist lunitic.
Was that a question? I think it must have been because it started with "Why", but I was confused by the lack of a question mark (?) which is the standard method of denoting a question. Mind you, experience of your respect for spelling and grammar should have taught me to be on my guard by now, so my bad, I guess.
In answer to your maybe-question: Why shouldn't you? Doesn't the Bible go on about spreading the good news (one of the nicer ways it says it. Others are more along the lines of "Kill Heathens!
")? I would have thought, if your antecedents failed to spread the good news to their own leader, that should lead you to question whether their good news was in fact a load of bollocks.
>This man has no idea what he's talking about
Which man? Also, if you mean the Pope, I would say he has a pretty damn good idea what he's talking about, being the boss.
>Why should I or any christian get upset at the ravings of a deluded atheist lunitic.
Was that a question? I think it must have been because it started with "Why", but I was confused by the lack of a question mark (?) which is the standard method of denoting a question. Mind you, experience of your respect for spelling and grammar should have taught me to be on my guard by now, so my bad, I guess.
In answer to your maybe-question: Why shouldn't you? Doesn't the Bible go on about spreading the good news (one of the nicer ways it says it. Others are more along the lines of "Kill Heathens!
")? I would have thought, if your antecedents failed to spread the good news to their own leader, that should lead you to question whether their good news was in fact a load of bollocks.
