Atheist struggling to answer a question i often propose to myself

[Amarok]

main logical demonstrations for theism, such as First Cause and Necessary Being. ... the skeptics are either denying reason's efficacy and/or asserting absurdity. Both approaches are nihilistic in nature.

There has never been I good case for a first cause . Let alone a case for a god being sais cause . And a rejection of both is in no way nihilistic or absurd no matter how much apologists assert this .

Same goes for the ontological argument universally these have failed to establish a Necessary Being let alone a god in that role . A rejection of this is in no way nihilistic or absurd no matter how much apologists assert this .

Once again you all hot air and apologist bluster .