Here's how he'd try to weasel out of that; because of his claim that there's such a thing as historical science, which can't be relied on because 'were you there', he'll say that we can use observational science (the only kind there is) to determine that humans don't live long enough to have been there, or some such bullshit. But then of course he's got the cumbersome difficulty of explaining away mythical figures like Methuselah and Noah who lived to be over 500 each.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
