(August 29, 2017 at 10:12 am)Cyberman Wrote:(August 29, 2017 at 9:40 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: But the same practical thinking that might lead to this alibi would also note the impracticality of every other aspect of the story. In other words, any creationist who can think up practical ways to increase the plausibility of an ark wouldn't have been dumb enough to be a creationist in the first place.
It's like trying to fit a duvet into a pillowcase. You might get one bit to fit properly, but not at the same time as everything else without hideous amounts of stretching.
It's so far-fetched that even trying to connect two parts would tear the thing wide open and not hold any of them afterward.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.