(September 1, 2017 at 9:34 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(September 1, 2017 at 6:33 pm)Alex K Wrote: Ok then let's concentrate on that one if you say so.
I don't understand a single word. This summary is just gibberish to me. Maybe too compressed?
If we aren't perceived as we are, we don't have an exact value. We do have an exact value. Therefore we are perceived exactly as we are. The only Vision that can see our exact value is perfect judgment.
Yes, this absolutely proves God.
Mister Agenda, look forward to your reply. At least you tried to digest it and refute (though I believe you contradicted yourself in trying to do so and aren't realizing how obvious one of the premises you are denying is).
If I didn't perceive Ann McCarthy as she was she didn't have an exact value. She did have an exact value. Therefore I did perceive here exactly as she was. The only vision that can see her exact value is MY DREAMY EYED DELUSION that a cheerleader would fall in love with me because I wanted her to.
MK, you are not a bad guy, but you are simply concocting dreamy eyed language to justify your romance of an ideal utopia, in the same way I wanted cheerleader Ann McCarthy to fall in love with me.
Your computer science education is realistic. Your religious idealism isn't. You really sound like I did with Ann, but your obsession is a god. Stop pining after a utopia. Nobody is demanding you ditch your belief by force. But reality isn't a dream. You can do well and do good by facing reality instead of dreaming.
