(September 7, 2017 at 2:44 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(September 7, 2017 at 2:00 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: As per usual, Jehanne in his complete ignorance of Catholicism is spewing incorrect information.
That was written in the year 1442 and was never proclaimed as dogmatic teaching. As I said and will say again, the revised consensus as of Vatican II is that a person need not be Catholic or even Christian while in this life to go to Heaven. But you can continue to pretend you know more about my faith than I do.
I was confirmed in the Catholic Church (married, too!), and am now an official apostate of the Catholic Church (see above). CL would have me believe that I cannot read, and she wants others to believe that they cannot read, also! Now, let's see what the Council of Florence, an ecumenical Council of the Catholic Church, said, "It firmly believes, professes and preaches...." But, yeah, not a "dogmatic teaching"!!! Ha!!!!
I am well aware that you are a former Catholic. And one that has proven time and time again to be very ignorant of your former faith. You should understand the differences between doctrines that are dogmatic and those that aren't, and the revisions of Vatican II. It's pretty basic stuff dude. Even the Poe who started this thread knew better than you.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
