RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
October 1, 2017 at 12:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 1, 2017 at 12:33 pm by Transcended Dimensions.)
Quote:You'd obstruct the real good of a satisfied sex offender just to satisfy your bad thoughts? Seems to me that you're an agent of immorality even by your own standards...and your standards of immorality are.....novel.
All I said here was that any situation I think of as being bad during a moment where I felt nothing but a positive emotion would not be any real bad in my life. Nonetheless, I would still make the choice to avoid that situation I thought of as being bad.
Quote:There's that pile of detritus.
Based upon your own personal experience, a misapprehension of anhedonia and the word misery....combined with an inaccurate description of a thought experiment and it's incompetent application, you've decided that there's no real bad to sex offense..but that you'd obstruct the real good of sex offense anyway due to your bad thoughts pursuant to harm and consequence.
You must understand how I define misery and anhedonia. I would actually define anhedonia as being an absence of those euphoric and dysphoric states while misery would be a dysphoric state. I would not define anhedonia as being an absence of the thought (decision) form of emotions since I don't think they exist anyway. From here, I define misery as being a dysphoric state. Again, that state would not come about through our thoughts alone.