RE: Emotions are intrinsically good and bad
October 5, 2017 at 5:07 pm
(This post was last modified: October 5, 2017 at 5:24 pm by Transcended Dimensions.)
(October 5, 2017 at 5:02 pm)Hammy Wrote:(October 5, 2017 at 4:57 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: I have experienced in between. Remember, if I feel a positive emotion at a small degree, then I define that as euphoria on a small level.
Your definition is definitely unsound. It would be more accurate to say that euphoria is happiness on a high level. Happiness can be either intense or mild but euphoria is only intense by definition.
Quote: What I am saying here is that I have never had a positive or negative experience independent of euphoria and dysphoria.
Well yeah, but only if we use your stupid definitions.
I told you earlier that, during my worst miserable moments, I have still believed it to be a good and beautiful thing to get help and change my life for the better. But I am telling you, there was no positive experience there. It was nothing but a negative experience. There is the difference between definitions and qualities. If I wasn't feeling hungry and I were to define a feeling of hunger as being nothing more than just the thought of getting something to eat, then there would be no feeling of hunger there. No quality of hunger would be present. If there was an empty glass and I defined water to be inside that glass, then no quality of water would be there. So, even though I defined a positive/negative experience as well as good/bad as being something independent of my euphoria and dysphoria, there was none actually there. Therefore, that is the reason why I have to instead adhere to my own personal and new definition of a positive/negative experience and good/bad. A quality of good/bad and a positive/negative experience is what I metaphorically describe as the inner light and the inner darkness.
