(October 10, 2017 at 4:28 pm)Divinity Wrote:(October 10, 2017 at 4:09 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I'm pretty sure Wooters is not a "far-right racist." If he were, he wouldn't spend so much time here, I think.
But the use of this kind of language is exactly what I'm talking about, and I'd say that you and Khemikal are doing a pretty good job of showing that there are, in fact, SJWs. Nor would I consider SJW a far-right term. I consider myself left-leaning, and I do not see dogmatization of discussions about race or anything else as a left-wing principle.
Left/right shouldn't be the metric most cared about. Truth / falsehood should be. What falsehood does the OP represent, actually? Do you dispute that those things happened? Do you think Neo's criticism of them should be disregarded because of who you think Neo is?
I mean let's be honest. He's using a stupid example in his opening post to dismiss serious claims.
What serious claims of racism is he dismissing?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
