RE: More Race Hysteria from SJW's
October 11, 2017 at 7:59 pm
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2017 at 8:03 pm by bennyboy.)
(October 11, 2017 at 6:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(October 11, 2017 at 6:45 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: You'd be wrong based on his posts here. He evidences both severe racism and severe neo-nazi tendencies from his very own words.
Would you mind copying and pasting his words that make you say he's severely racist and severely neo nazi?
(October 11, 2017 at 6:45 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: Not really, C_L's a bit like what the Irish far right catholics have managed to create, Cora Sherlock, a very soft spoken superficially mild and pleasant person who when she lets her guard down ends up being full (link) Hitler Jugend Defenceand Opus Dei religious nutball.
In other words she really doesn't give two shits if a person is good, as long as they are doctrinaire.
Oh I'm a neo Nazi too apparently lol.
I'd also like to see the actual damning posts-- which are often mentioned, but I have yet to actually see them quoted. It may be that Tazzycorn's and others' interpretations OF what you guys have said have led them to essentially call you witches.
There's certainly an overlap in this thread, in the Charlottesville thread, and so on. It seems clear that at least in these forums, there's some parallel between religious affiliations, political affiliation, and stances on race issues. However, it seems to me very likely that you and Wooters are probably more moderate than your friends, your political peers and so on, and that this is a big part of the reason that you frequent these atheist forums despite being theists (or at least deists?)
Tazzycorn's post, Tizheruk's before, and a few others, while they point out some trends in your positions which I think are probably real enough, also REVEAL a trend, the one I was talking about earlier: the tendency to demonize people who, while they don't exactly say anything deeply offensive, seem to be on the wrong side of the dogma. "Nazi" is pretty obviously code for "someone who doesn't fully endorse all the positions which we think everyone must take." In other words, there are some positions which are not intellectual ones, but are flags for membership or refusal of membership in that group of people whose opinions are worthy of consideration. That's dogma, and you are therefore a heretic by that standard.