(October 18, 2017 at 4:19 pm)Drich Wrote:(October 18, 2017 at 3:28 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: The claim that no U.S. President prior to Obama 'presided' over an economy in which the GDP dipped below 3.0 is utter horseshit. If one compares annual real GDP growth, there are several examples of exactly that happening prior to Obama's administration. Yes, the economy's recovery was sluggish under Obama, but so were the economies of most highly developed countries following the crash in '08. I doubt it can all be laid at Obama's feet.
Perhaps there's something going on at the macro- level that all of this U.S. political shit-throwing doesn't get at.
You got google sport. find me an example.
IF you were honest you would see articles that talk about obama not seeing a 3% GDP growth since Hoover... Who was Hoover? oh, the guy who presided over the great depression in the 1930s!!! Meaning Hoover SAW at the worst of the worst 3% GDP. Obama went well below that.
In TRUTH your 'golden boy' and his policies forced americans in alot of ways to live a harder life and experience more economic turmoil than what was experienced in the great depression of the 1930s, but you fake news buddies will never allow the headlines truly reflect what this man has done to this country..
Now most of you may have never known what this country can do when the ecconomy is solid and genuinly good. Just give it a few years and you will be on the trump train too!
You have Google, too, Sport. Do your own homework.
Just make sure we're comparing apples to apples. I'm talking real GDP rates, not simply GDP rates. You do know the difference, right?
