RE: Argument from "better to seek proper vision".
October 24, 2017 at 7:01 am
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2017 at 7:02 am by Cyberman.)
All these logical arguments set out to do is postulate scenarios that could make the existence of gods sound plausible. Your point 2, for example, which you concluded was a slam dunk that proves your god - we literally don't have any "reason to believe one can gain vision of guidance", unless and until one can be demonstrated. Your argument doesn't do that, it simply tries to assert that we do and then claim QED based on that. That's why all these exercises are pointless.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
