(October 23, 2017 at 4:08 pm)speedyj1992 Wrote:(October 18, 2017 at 3:43 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote: Because you act like it all so simple and obvious. There is no reason for a god to even enter the discussion. It's just a feel-good response to shit you don't understand.
Ok, so it seems like discussion is not something that's particularly intriguing to you - do you mind if I ask you why not? If I made it seem as if this is all obvious, I admit that to be my mistake, and I apologize, because it isn't, and if any believer makes it seem like it is, they're wrong, and I'm sorry that you have to deal with that. But I'd love to hear more about how you got to your perspective on this topic.
What kind of discussion is possible when you claim knowledge that you don't have? There is no objective, verifiable evidence for your or any god. Until you can prove otherwise, you're just asserting and I'm just asking for evidence.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
