Argument from "better to seek proper vision".

[Angrboda]

1. It is better to sincerely try to objectively seek the vision of guidance rather than not.
2. If God doesn't exist, there is no reason to believe one can gain vision of guidance.
3. If there is no reason to believe one can gain vision of guidance, then it is not better to objectively seek the vision of guidance rather then not.

1, 3. If both these premises are true, we can conclude there is a reason to believe one can vision of guidance. Call this premise (4).

4, 2 proves God exists if both premises are true.

Morality is guidance, whether innate and coming from evolution, or otherwise, it is but guidance and vision on how to act with true love or justice.

Your own words refute premise 2.

Stop trying to provide philosophical arguments that God exists. You suck at it.