RE: Morality
November 1, 2017 at 5:36 am
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2017 at 5:42 am by WinterHold.)
(October 31, 2017 at 9:21 am)Industrial Lad Wrote:AtlasS33 Wrote:Let's take sex without an official contract. That type of sex is enjoyable, allows for more freedom in picking up the partner, go easy on the person's wallet. Confronted with the cons of the possibility of producing a child, and the possibility of hurting a current spouse emotionally to great degrees.
Judging the act as "morally good" or "morally bad" is subjective. Take me: personally; I would never cause misery to a yet-to be born infant; and ruin his/her childhood through making them go through the pain of the absence of a parent, just because I wanted to enjoy myself.
If you lived in the West, you would have free access to condoms which would make pregnancy highly unlikely unless used incorrectly.
Also, if the condom fails, there's the morning after pill.
The revolution in manufacturing is pretty new; IL. It's only in the latest years that we began to see these methods.
Take it back 100 years ago; it wasn't that simple. Heck; even today, many go bareback -I think- and many don't take protection or whatsoever.
(October 31, 2017 at 11:43 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Woody Allen once said something like 'Without love, sex is a shallow, meaningless act. But as shallow, meaningless acts go, it's one of the best.'
Staying away from sex without contract is one of the hardest sentences in Islam. The act though is a beautiful way of transferring emotions between people, so beautiful it should not be abused though. Abusing it cause lots of disasters that weigh the good feeling
