(November 4, 2017 at 11:27 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(November 4, 2017 at 11:21 pm)Transcended Dimensions Wrote: Your final sentence is what I was talking about. These pieces of knowledge you are accessing are claims of evidence to support your worldview. I have my own set of knowledge to support my view.You have your own set of opinions and positions..but since they're exclusionary positions...it only takes a single dissenting example to make them false.
Quote:But, as I said earlier, it could really be the case that neither pieces of knowledge are any real evidence and that we just don't know who is right and who is wrong. In that case, it really would all come down to that burned earth quote.You done pouring gasoline on the grass yet, or would you like some help? You're wrong, it only takes one example to show that you're wrong. That example exists. You;re wrong even in the absence of that example because your worldview is internally inconsistent..it can't all be true even by reference to itself and what you insist to be true. In fact, you couldn't be more wrong if you were trying to be wrong..which you obviously aren't. I;d go so far as to characterize your "worldview" as even less than wrong. It fails to rise to the level of credibly inaccurate. It's just you rambling about shit and disagreeing with yourself.
Knowledge in each of these regards can be had and is possessed.
Then I see no contradictions with my view. I don't see how it is inconsistent then. I just don't understand this because I really don't see it. You are free to point out/recap those contradictions right here if you wish.