RE: Atheists don't realize asking for evidence of God is a strawman
November 9, 2017 at 10:09 am
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2017 at 10:10 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
@Khemikal
* Bible is a religious work not a scientific work.
* Give me scientific evidence for a God.
* But Bible isn't a scientific work
What is your response? Is Bible a scientific work or not? Or do you have any proof to back up your claim/straw that you implicitly made when you asked for scientific evidence from a religious textbook.
I've explained it perfectly to you.
Lol there you go talking about unrelated stuff like DNA tests... Answer this for me is Bible a scientific work or. Not?
* Bible is a religious work not a scientific work.
* Give me scientific evidence for a God.
* But Bible isn't a scientific work
What is your response? Is Bible a scientific work or not? Or do you have any proof to back up your claim/straw that you implicitly made when you asked for scientific evidence from a religious textbook.
I've explained it perfectly to you.
(November 9, 2017 at 10:05 am)Mathilda Wrote:(November 9, 2017 at 9:59 am)pool the matey Wrote: Again wrong. Since you have no intention to properly read the op I'll give you a summary
*Only scientific works need to submit scientific evidence
And from this one faulty premise the rest can be ignored.
You keep saying that we haven't read your OP. We have. No one agrees with it.
Scientific evidence is used for other inquiries. And not all evidence is scientific. A court of law will use scientific evidence if it is available e.g. DNA analysis. But a court wion't wait for a paper to be published in a peer reviewed journal before passing a sentence. Political systems set up enquiries all the time that take into account all forms of evidence.
Lol there you go talking about unrelated stuff like DNA tests... Answer this for me is Bible a scientific work or. Not?
