RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 5:52 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2017 at 5:55 pm by Mystic.)
(November 13, 2017 at 5:45 pm)Cyberman Wrote: If you were arguing along the lines of "God is not not all-knowing", you would have a point that its negation would carry the meaning that "God is all-knowing". But what you're trying to smuggle in is more along the lines of "God is not not all-unknowing", which is not the same thing at all.
Triple negation, would lead back to negation. Even negations make it go away, and odd negations make it negation again.
So your phrase would mean God not All-Knowing.