(November 19, 2017 at 4:05 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: With respect to the OP, the issue largely comes up with respect to NT reliability. The pointgenerally made by believers is that skeptic have ruled out the supernatural in advance or at least raised the burden of proof to an unobtainable level. As such the very nature of the thing we are trying to prove serves as the reason given for not accepting evidence of it. It's a no win situation.
I guess so. And while you keep your fantasies to yourself and let the rest of us live in the natural world we can grasp, you have removed yourself from concrete discussion. While you can live in a world of concocting philosophies, everybody else lives in reality.
It is a no win situation beause you can't create gods out of your imagination, as much you wish it. Those gods you might believe aren't even congruent.
You should try like saint Antony and preach that half arsed bullshit to the fish. Otherwise, you are at the end of your wits, like many in the face of the horrid real world we all have to live in.
All your book testifies is, the gullibility of the common folk. those that are not just waste the pursuit for bullshit and pretend to do nything of worth.
