I know everyone is sick of raking over this particular subject. I just know that I've said in so many words, 'hearsay and testimony are not evidence, and claims which carry serious consequences shouldn't be accepted on those things, alone.' But, in the case is Roy Moore I have done exactly that, and I think that despite a total lack of physical evidence, the conclusion that he is probably guilty is a reasonable one.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
