(November 19, 2017 at 11:20 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(November 19, 2017 at 11:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I know everyone is sick of raking over this particular subject. I just know that I've said in so many words, 'hearsay and testimony are not evidence, and claims which carry serious consequences shouldn't be accepted on those things, alone.' But, in the case is Roy Moore I have done exactly that, and I think that despite a total lack of physical evidence, the conclusion that he is probably guilty is a reasonable one.
In the court of public opinion, I would agree. In a legal court of law, I don't believe it satisfies the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Personally, I think the guy is as guilty as the sky is blue. That doesn't mean I'd be ready to vote to convict him on the charges with the current level of evidence, were I on the jury.
Agreed. I'm assuming the statute of limitations has run out for the women in Moore's case?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
