(November 25, 2017 at 1:15 pm)DLJ Wrote:(November 25, 2017 at 8:59 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: No. Advocating dictatorship like Marx did is something, Capitalistic systems are something else.
Communism is beating the rich kid and taking all their cash out of jealousy, hate and insane dreams of utopia. That's why the soviet union fell and the U.S survived.
Muslims saw what soviets mean in wars. Afghanistan, Chechnya, the leftovers of Syria now, Egypt's army...etc.
Communism is hell. It means a rifle and a boot to your teeth, just for having money.
Not all political systems are punishing those who are born wealthy like communism does. Not all systems enforce atheism on its citizens (slaves). Not all systems shoot you for praying in public.
At least we can pray and talk under capitalism.
Capital isn't the system, it's just a means of oiling the wheels.
"beating the rich kid and taking all their cash out of jealousy, hate and insane dreams of utopia." ... could also be said of the French Revolution. Guillotines instead of rifles and jack boots.
"Muslims saw what soviets mean in wars. Afghanistan, Chechnya, the leftovers of Syria now..." are you claiming that Russia adopts a communist system? Nope. Think more like: White, Christian Oligarchy ... same as the US.
No; the French did exactly what I wrote as the right thing to do:
Quote:AtlasS33 said:
https://atheistforums.org/thread-52301-p...pid1663075
. Punishing and preventing robbing and stealing should be the main concern of anybody wanting economic justice. Communism is derived from the hatred of the poor working class to the rich owners, it's the revolution of the hungry. They should've punish thieves instead of punishing ANY wealthy individual.
Guillotines were a punishment for thieves that enslaved workers and took the money of the natives.
In communism; there is no investigation even. The system itself is designed to take your cash and call it "justice"