Street Epistemology - Practice

[RoadRunner79]

No;  I accept neither on epistemological grounds.  You haven't provided sufficient evidence.

Are you stating that you accept neither cat nor dragon?

That seems to be what I had said yes.

Do you agree, that between two similar scenarios given the same facts, and given the same reasons, that a coherent and consistent logical foundation should come to the same conclusion?  If not, how do you logically justify the discrepancy.

Sure. Then you must accept that neither cat nor dragon actually exist.

I don't think that follows.   Why do you think that?   

Also, if you don't participate in the conversation, more than ignoring what I say, and asking the same questions over and over, then this isn't going to go to much farther.  If you are trying to make a point, then perhaps you should just state it, and we can look at it.