(November 28, 2017 at 12:04 am)curiosne Wrote:(November 27, 2017 at 10:59 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I agree, that you are not understanding. What I am trying to say, is that there is no sliding, subjective low to high epistemically burden, based on your or my incredulity, or how common it is. I would say that it is difficult to pin down exactly where that line is, and I think we will vary there, and I don’t quibble over an allowance for that. However as you agreed, that the same reason and logic should produce the same results, the same applies epistemologically.
so how do you determine if you have sufficient evidence to believe in a claim or not?
I don’t understand, it’s not like I am saying that there is no line to be drawn. Where do you think that there is an issue.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
