(November 28, 2017 at 12:54 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(November 28, 2017 at 12:50 am)Hammy Wrote: No I'm not against logic but God is non-physical so having physical evidence of him makes no sense. Are you against logic?
Ok..direct evidence sure.... I don’t think that by one is claiming that at least from the Judea/Christian view that evidence is a piece of God in a test tube.
Whether direct or indirect is irrelevant. We are physical beings and you've already accepted the fact the evidence therefore has to be physical. But if the evidence has to be physical then it can't be evidence of anything non-physical because even any 'indirect' signs that were left over, would be left over in the physical world we live in, and detectable by our physical senses, thereby not being evidence of anything non-physical at all.
Quote:No I’m not against logic.... and I think that logic can give you reason to believe...
Arguments have to be related to something in the real world to have anything that bears with reality though. You can make a valid argument about imaginary entities but you'll be missing soundness.
