Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency

[Edwardo Piet]

No i'm afraid that is not what i mean

Then what do you mean? What do you think the concept of time working "both ways" would entail? Because the way I see it that by definition leads to contradictions because the concept of time is already defined in such a way that it only makes sense if it moves forwards. What happens next means what happens in the future, but if time worked both ways that would mean that what happens next could be the past, but the past isn't what happens next the future is, that's what "the future" means, it means whatever happens next. So it doesn't seem to make any sense.