RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 28, 2017 at 2:47 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2017 at 2:50 pm by Mystic.)
(November 28, 2017 at 2:41 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(November 28, 2017 at 2:36 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: When you see a masterpiece, you know there is an Artist behind it. The whole thing comes together and there is no doubt about a designer.
Aside from the absurd evolution theory that has been dis-proven in many ways, is the over all masterpiece we are in.
Aside from the design, is "who" we are, which is defined by a perfect absolute judge who gives us exact measurement and makes inherit our deeds justly and values us accordingly to our specific situation and judges with perfect light, mainly, the light of himself who is the perfect perception and the perfectly witnessed by himself and no one truly witnesses God in full except himself, while we all witness him witnessing us and emanating his light to us whether we like it or not, whether we acknowledge or not.
I find the greatest mastery in nature itself working with wind and the elements and the play of life over the planet. No gods required. But go on deflecting the praise deserved by the natural world on to the creation of your imagination.
You can assert time and time again that no God is required, but that won't make the proofs go away, just be a shortcoming on your part, I live in a place where secular theories were taught to me about everything, I bought evolution and all the geology non-sense of how things cam to be for a time. Half-knowledge and half baked theories can make anything seem true or reasonable.
Cults arise from half baked knowledge. But when you begin to seek certainty and you know things for certain, and work with what you know for certain, you will see the propaganda is just that, propaganda.
The problem is not the evidence, it's the way it's analyzed. Even fallacies which I hinted before about, they are trying do away with foundational ways human speak and often proper reasoning.
It happens to be you can't just cut and dry say "this and that" is always a fallacy for a lot of the supposed fallacies- it's situational, reasoning, just like courage is situational and can go to extremism of foolishness and idiocy or carelessness or haughtiness or combination of that.
And to be good is part of reason and reason is part of goodness, and so there is unity in a lot things we think are not together.