RE: Religion stifles Moral Evolution
December 1, 2017 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2017 at 7:40 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(December 1, 2017 at 7:35 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(December 1, 2017 at 6:51 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Google is your friend:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law
I'm wondering something that perhaps you can help me with. Why did "Natural Law" take heterosexual relationships as the standard in deciding what the purpose of relationships was instead of using homosexual relationships as the standard of what the "right and true" purpose of sex is?
Our bodies as male and female are geared towards coming together for procreation. Sex is the whole reason we evolved to have penises and vaginas. Saying that homosexual sex is actually the standard makes no sense at all.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
