RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
August 19, 2011 at 6:26 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2011 at 6:29 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(August 19, 2011 at 5:41 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You just quoted romans to prove that scripture was true.hock: It doesn't matter whether or not you believe that your argument isn't circular. It is. Mr Fucking Math isn't Logic over here. This is embarrassing.
I think your comprehension skills are what you should be embarrassed about. I used Romans to explain why people in different societies come up with similiar moral laws. However, quoting scripture to support scripture is not anymore invalid than using my different senses to support my senses as a whole.
Quote:
Can you give an example of any god who has done so?
I knew you'd dodge that question. Yes I can, but only one.
(August 19, 2011 at 6:25 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Do you want me to put up a list of animals that live in societies, or will you just retract that unfortunate bit of gibberish?
Again, comprehension, it matters. I didn't say any other animals, I said all animals. Not all animals live in societies, why not? Because evolution favored them not to. How do you know this? Because they don't live in societies. Why not? Because evolution favored them not to.....around and around we go!
