Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.

[Statler Waldorf]

Statler has a view of evolution that all creatures are evolving steadily upwards past reliable landmarks until they eventually become more like western scholars.

To him, evolution is some kind of spirit that runs around arranging things. It also bears mention, that his idea of defending his circular reasoning is whining about evolution.

I recognize evolution for what it really is; a process that preserves downhill change in animals. You claim it can do magic things that it has never been observed to do. I am not the one who brought evolution up anyways.

Given your worldview, why should people not use circular arguments? This should be fun.

---

I remember sitting in Advanced Evolutionary Biology in university and listening to the Professor talk about how one day a dinosaur that had developed feathers for warmth ran with its arms outstretched to capture food and accidentally learned how to fly.

You are either lying, remember incorrectly, or your Professor was an idiot.

He was a staunch Darwinist and Atheist so it is probably the third option.

You never answered my question though, how do you know that is why people live in groups and some animals do not? Did anyone observe these things to happen? Why do some people not live in groups then? Is it because evolution favored these people at the same time it was favoring the people who lived in groups? Sounds like your theory is far too flexible.