RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
August 19, 2011 at 7:14 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2011 at 7:15 pm by Paul the Human.)
(August 19, 2011 at 7:08 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: He was a staunch Darwinist and Atheist so it is probably the third option.
Heheh! Well... if he really said that, he was being facetious or grossly generalizing. Natural selection is not difficult to understand (though you seem to have a spot of trouble), but it is a long, drawn out, and complicated process.
Anyway... you have strengthened my belief that your perceptions are skewed by your desire that your god be real. I'll back out of the way now and let you get back to your previous discussion.
(August 19, 2011 at 7:08 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: You never answered my question though, how do you know that is why people live in groups and some animals do not? Did anyone observe these things to happen? Why do some people not live in groups then? Is it because evolution favored these people at the same time it was favoring the people who lived in groups? Sounds like your theory is far too flexible.
'Evolution' is not some mysterious force that goes around changing things at will. You really do not get it.
