RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
August 19, 2011 at 7:18 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2011 at 7:20 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(August 19, 2011 at 7:14 pm)Paul the Human Wrote:(August 19, 2011 at 7:08 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: He was a staunch Darwinist and Atheist so it is probably the third option.
Heheh! Well... if he really said that, he was being facetious or grossly generalizing. Natural selection is not difficult to understand (though you seem to have a spot of trouble), but it is a long, drawn out, and complicated process.
Anyway... you have strengthened my belief that your perceptions are skewed by your desire that your god be real. I'll back out of the way now and let you get back to your previous discussion.
You should teach a course in back-handed insults. You did just commit the old natural selection = evolution equivocation fallacy.
You have strengthened my view that your own depravity has blinded you from seeing what is so obvious in life. Cheers Paul, at least we both love Iced Earth, that's one thing we've got!
(August 19, 2011 at 7:14 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: 'Evolution' is not some mysterious force that goes around changing things at will. You really do not get it.
Your inability to defend the theory leads me to believe you don't get it either.
