(December 12, 2017 at 6:45 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Ok, now:I didn't give you a bible story. I will assume that your talking about the story of creation from the bible. Biblical creation is a farce as there are no verbs in the autographed language of the bible that can possibly be translated as "creation, create". The verbs in the autographed languages all have to do with making, forming, building, founding.
What part of any of that is remotely hinted at in your bible story?
The word "creation" is a transliteration of the Latin creatura and given the Latin idea of ex nilio(from nothing). Well, how stupid is that?! Yet, it's taught every Sunday. Somehow, tradition has superseded the Word of God!
How many times is religion going to butt heads with science and get their asses kicked. Yet, when I look at the autographed language I see no contradiction between science and the bible. The bible explains somethings that science observes and science explains somethings I read in the bible. Things like the rib which has marrow loaded with multipotent stem cells and which rib also grows back if the surgeon leaved the sheath that houses it intact.
We couldn't know why the bible said such things until recently. Or, why Genesis 1:1 says bara which means: carve, or whittle but can also mean to speak into existence. NOT CREATES! Quantum physics, as it relates to the mechanics of the vacuum as energy has no disagreement on the mechanical possibility. I didn't know why it said that until I started studying quantum physics.
2,000yrs ago the church didn't understand it so they made up some shit creation story. Remember, they said the world was flat and the bible actually states the it is a sphere! They also believe in a young earth which is also not biblical according to the syntax.
So again, I didn't give you a story.
